# How Chorus Innovations uses mabl

**94%**: “representing a 94% reduction in manual effort”

As published on [mabl.com](https://www.mabl.com/customer-stories/reducing-test-times-with-chorus-innovations). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-09.

- Company: [Chorus Innovations](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/chorus-innovations.md)
- Tool: [mabl](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/mabl.md)
- Teams: QA

## What the story says

Chorus Innovations, a digital health platform with complex user flows, uses mabl to replace manual regression testing with automated end-to-end tests. The QA team built a suite of over 400 automated tests covering a significant portion of the platform.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and Chorus Innovations, not ours.

> Reduced Regression Time: Regression testing was significantly reduced, representing a 94% reduction in manual effort.

- **120 hours**: “Before mabl, Chorus relied solely on manual regression testing, taking a staggering 120 hours per release cycle.”
- **400**: “Increased Coverage: The Chorus team built a suite of over 400 automated end-to-end tests, covering a significant portion of the platform's features.”

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-09.

- Checked: the figure 94% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Chorus Innovations.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Chorus Innovations.
- Checked: each number in our summary is printed on the page.
- Checked: Chorus Innovations uses mabl. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-09.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/chorus-innovations-mabl · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology