# How Common App uses CodeRabbit

**35%**: “After implementing CodeRabbit, Common App reduced code review time by up to 35%.”

As published on [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/how-common-app-cut-code-review-time-by-35-percent-and-found-more-bugs). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-08.

- Company: [Common App](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/common-app.md)
- Tool: [CodeRabbit](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/coderabbit.md)

## What the story says

Common App's development team uses CodeRabbit to automatically review pull requests, generating summaries and sequence diagrams and flagging bugs such as race conditions and logic errors. This lets them cut the number of manual reviewers per pull request and have the remaining reviewer focus on business logic.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of CodeRabbit and Common App, not ours.

> After implementing CodeRabbit, Common App reduced code review time by up to 35%. This was because CodeRabbit flagged so many critical issues that Common App was able to reduce the number of people who reviewed their PRs.

> CodeRabbit didn’t just save time, it helped us ship better code
>
> Amit Kumar, Principal Software Developer

Source: [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/how-common-app-cut-code-review-time-by-35-percent-and-found-more-bugs), captured 2026-10-08.

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-08.

- Checked: the figure 35% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Common App.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Common App.
- Checked: Common App uses CodeRabbit. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-08.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/common-app-coderabbit · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology