# How CoverGo uses Momentic

**30%** Reduction in production incidents

As published on [momentic.ai](https://momentic.ai/customers/covergo). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-06.

- Company: [CoverGo](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/covergo.md)
- Tool: [Momentic](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/momentic.md)
- Teams: QA

## What the story says

CoverGo's QA team replaced its Playwright automations with plain-English Momentic tests that validate end-to-end insurance platform workflows. The tests run on Momentic's built-in scheduler as daily and weekly suites, with failure alerts sent to Slack.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Momentic and CoverGo, not ours.

> Partnering with Momentic enabled CoverGo to transform testing from a bottleneck into a scalable engine for development velocity. As end-to-end coverage expanded across critical workflows, fewer defects reached UAT and production environments — improving release confidence as the platform continued to scale.

- **30%**: “30% reduction”
- **10+**: “10+ bugs caught”

> We've already seen a 30% decrease in production incidents thanks to Momentic's automated testing.
>
> HANNA K., HEAD OF QA

> With Momentic, we no longer have to choose between speed, coverage, and quality.
>
> Hanna Kuzub, Head of QA at CoverGo

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-06.

- Checked: the figure 30% is on the page; its label is our wording.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of CoverGo.
- Checked: CoverGo uses Momentic. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-06.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/covergo-momentic · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology