# How Cybrary uses Beautiful

**50%**: “cut presentation and production time by 50%”

As published on [beautiful.ai](https://www.beautiful.ai/customers/cybrary), January 2024. Captured by usedby on 2026-10-09.

- Company: [Cybrary](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/cybrary.md)
- Tool: [Beautiful](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/beautiful.md)
- Teams: Creative Services, Design, Instructors, Content

## What the story says

Cybrary's instructors build course presentations in Beautiful.ai, while the design team uses centralized themes, fonts, templates and branding to keep decks consistent and reduce cleanup work. The platform also provides animations for virtual courses.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Beautiful and Cybrary, not ours.

> By using Beautiful.ai, Cybrary is able to save 50% design time.

- **80 to 100**: “Cybrary has anywhere from 80 to 100 instructors building a deck in Beautiful.ai at any given time.”
- **30 to 40**: “In addition to that, the Cybrary team is onboarding 30 to 40 new instructors each week.”

> I would say Beautiful.ai increased our efficiency. I mean, 50% sounds crazy, but it's probably pretty close to accurate when you consider all of the manual stuff that we used to have to do.
>
> Tommy Horlacher, Head of Creative Services

Source: [beautiful.ai](https://www.beautiful.ai/customers/cybrary), captured 2026-10-09.

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-09.

- Checked: the figure 50% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Cybrary.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Cybrary.
- Checked: the publication date is read from the page’s own metadata, never guessed.
- Checked: Cybrary uses Beautiful. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-09.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/cybrary-beautiful · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology