# How Drata uses QA Wolf

**86%**: “Drata secured 86% faster QA cycles”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/drata). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Drata](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/drata.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: QA, Engineering

## What the story says

Drata uses QA Wolf to run and maintain its automated regression test suite, replacing a mix of manual and automated testing. QA Wolf engineers investigate and maintain the tests so Drata's engineers can focus on shipping new features.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Drata, not ours.

> With these tests running in parallel, and QA Wolf engineers providing 24/5 investigation and maintenance, Drata has reduced their automated testing time from 1–2 hours to 10–15 minutes.

- **$500,000/year**: “More than $500,000/year saved and reinvested”
- **90 minutes**: “Regression testing is 90 minutes faster than before, and includes 4x more test cases.”
- **400%**: “400% more test cases, 86% faster QA cycles”
- **10–15 minutes**: “Drata has reduced their automated testing time from 1–2 hours to 10–15 minutes.”

> Everyone's very happy in leadership to see that we can release at DrataSpeed. QA Wolf has given us full confidence on each release and we’re very happy.
>
> Denver Peterson, Sr. Manager of QA

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 86% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Drata.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Drata.
- Checked: Drata uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/drata-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology