# How Lindy uses Metaview

**2–4 hours**: “2–4 hours saved per day screening inbound candidates”

As published on [metaview.ai](https://www.metaview.ai/resources/case-study/lindy-ai-native-recruiting-engine). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Lindy](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/lindy.md)
- Tool: [Metaview](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/metaview.md)
- Teams: Sales, Engineering

## What the story says

Lindy uses Metaview to review and triage inbound applications, source and research candidates, and screen them before they reach engineers, handling recruiting without a dedicated recruiter. It also connects to their ATS, Teamtailor.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Metaview and Lindy, not ours.

> Metaview automates application review and triages candidates, so Drope can get straight to the most interesting profiles.

- **2–4 hours**: “Another 2–4 hours saved on sourcing, candidate research, and filtering”
- **a week**: “Up to a week faster reviewing inbound candidates”
- **2–3 team members**: “2–3 team members hired per month without burdening Lindy's engineering team”

> Metaview has probably sped up our inbound review process by one week. I love the screening aspect of Metaview so much.
>
> Lindy Drope, Founding member and Head of Sales

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 2–4 hours is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Lindy.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Lindy.
- Checked: Lindy uses Metaview. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/lindy-metaview · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology