# How Mastra uses CodeRabbit

**70-85%** acceptance rate of critical CodeRabbit comments

As published on [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/mastra-finally-found-an-ai-code-review-tool-their-team-can-trust). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-08.

- Company: [Mastra](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/mastra.md)
- Tool: [CodeRabbit](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/coderabbit.md)
- Teams: Engineering

## What the story says

Mastra's engineers use CodeRabbit as the first reviewer on every pull request, fixing all of its comments before merging. It flags security vulnerabilities, breaking changes and incorrect API usage across their TypeScript agent framework codebase.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of CodeRabbit and Mastra, not ours.

> Mastra's team doesn't skip CodeRabbit's feedback; they address it all. The numbers prove that engineers accept and resolve 70 to 85% of critical comments before merging any PR.

> Once all the CodeRabbit comments are gone and tests are passing, you feel a lot more confident pushing the green button.
>
> Abhi Aiyer, CTO

Source: [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/mastra-finally-found-an-ai-code-review-tool-their-team-can-trust), captured 2026-10-08.

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-08.

- Checked: the figure 70-85% is on the page; its label is our wording.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Mastra.
- Checked: Mastra uses CodeRabbit. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-08.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/mastra-coderabbit · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology