# How Metronome uses QA Wolf

**11 minutes**: “Full end-to-end regression cycle in 11 minutes.”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/metronome). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Metronome](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/metronome.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: Engineering

## What the story says

Metronome, a usage-based billing platform, uses QA Wolf to write and maintain its end-to-end regression tests, replacing manual testing by individual engineers. Developers record a short video of each new feature, QA Wolf turns it into tests in the suite, and test coverage is part of Metronome's definition of done.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Metronome, not ours.

> We have about 400 tests that run in about 11 minutes, and the flake score is under 1%. We rarely get a false negative failure in QA Wolf, and I was actually quite surprised at how responsive the QA Wolf team was on those tests.

- **4**: “Increased to 4 fully-tested production deployments per day.”
- **1%**: “Less than 1% flake rate.”

> We have about 400 tests that run in about 11 minutes, and the flake score is under 1%.
>
> Elia Karagiannis, Product Platform Engineer

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 11 minutes is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Metronome.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Metronome.
- Checked: Metronome uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/metronome-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology