# How NetSPI uses CodeRabbit

**1.22 weeks**: “CodeRabbit estimates 1.22 weeks of reviewer time saved”

As published on [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/how-netspi-brings-code-quality-back-in-line-with-ai-driven-throughput-with-coderabbit). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-19.

- Company: [NetSPI](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/netspi.md)
- Tool: [CodeRabbit](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/coderabbit.md)
- Industry: [Cybersecurity](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/industry/cybersecurity.md)
- Teams: Engineering, Senior engineers, Junior engineers

## What the story says

NetSPI's engineering organization uses CodeRabbit as the first automated layer of pull request review to catch baseline issues in AI-generated code. This frees senior engineers to focus on architecture, security and other contextual questions.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of CodeRabbit and NetSPI, not ours.

> CodeRabbit became NetSPI’s first review layer, catching recurring baseline issues before senior engineers had to spend their attention on them.

- **56.5%**: “CodeRabbit has earned broad adoption across NetSPI’s engineering organization with an acceptance rate of 56.5%.”
- **64.7%**: “Developers accepted 64.7% of stability and availability findings and 62.7% of data integrity and integration findings.”
- **58.3%**: “There was also a 58.3% acceptance rate of major-severity comments.”
- **69.6%**: “Over the last three months, there were 140 new Learnings created and applied approximately 4,560 times, reaching 69.6% of reviewed pull requests.”

> CodeRabbit being able to come in and catch this baseline level of quality for us has broadly spared the senior devs from needing to go back through and find these simple issues
>
> Andrew Graham, Vice President of Engineering

Source: [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/how-netspi-brings-code-quality-back-in-line-with-ai-driven-throughput-with-coderabbit), captured 2026-10-19.

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-19.

- Checked: the figure 1.22 weeks is printed word for word on the page, near the name of NetSPI.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of NetSPI.
- Checked: NetSPI uses CodeRabbit. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-19.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/netspi-coderabbit · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology