# How Padlet uses QA Wolf

**15%**: “Padlet's PMs get 15% more time each week”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/padlet). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Padlet](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/padlet.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: Product

## What the story says

Padlet uses QA Wolf to automate and maintain end-to-end regression tests for its web app, replacing a no-code testing tool and manual testing. QA Wolf manages the test suite and reports only verified bugs.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Padlet, not ours.

> Product leadership was spending 5–6 hours a week triaging the no-code tool they were using—which was only covering 5–10% of their application. By managing their test suite and only reporting verified bugs, Padlet’s leadership can focus on innovating and making an impact.

- **95%**: “Automated test coverage went from less than 10% to over 95%”
- **5–6 hours**: “Product leadership was spending 5–6 hours a week triaging the no-code tool they were using”

> Beyond the time and focus that was freed up, the real benefit of QA Wolf is that we can test far more than we were able to test before—and more than we realistically ever would have been able to do—which has led to a much more stable and reliable application.
>
> Collin Palmer, Product Manager

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 15% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Padlet.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Padlet.
- Checked: Padlet uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/padlet-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology