# How Peek uses Augment Code

**80%**: “Test Automation Time Cut by 80%”

As published on [augmentcode.com](https://www.augmentcode.com/customers/peek). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-09.

- Company: [Peek](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/peek.md)
- Tool: [Augment Code](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/augment-code.md)
- Industry: [Travel & Hospitality](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/industry/travel-hospitality.md)
- Teams: Engineering, Full-stack engineers, Architects

## What the story says

Peek's engineering team uses Augment Code to generate automation tests, handle boilerplate-heavy coding tasks, navigate legacy Ruby repositories, and prototype new internal apps. It was selected after a three-week-per-tool comparison with GitHub Copilot and Cursor.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Augment Code and Peek, not ours.

> With Augment, what used to take 2–3 days was done in just a few hours,” said Larson. “That was huge—especially for engineers unfamiliar with the repo or writing tests from scratch.

- **10x**: “10x Speedup for Boilerplate Tasks”

> With Augment, what used to take 2–3 days was done in just a few hours
>
> Rachel Larson, Director of Engineering

Source: [augmentcode.com](https://www.augmentcode.com/customers/peek), captured 2026-10-09.

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-09.

- Checked: the figure 80% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Peek.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Peek.
- Checked: Peek uses Augment Code. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-09.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/peek-augment-code · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology