# How Scope3 uses QA Wolf

**$300k+**: “$300k+ saved in engineering costs annually”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/qa-wolf-saves-scope3-300k-yr-and-doubled-release-velocity-with-a-dedicated-qa-engineer). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Scope3](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/scope3.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: Engineering

## What the story says

Scope3 works with a dedicated QA Wolf engineer who is embedded in its development team. The engineer writes and maintains automated end-to-end tests that run in the CI/CD pipeline with every deploy, covering new features as they are built.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Scope3, not ours.

> Instead of hiring a full-time QA manager, QA Wolf assigned Marri Kang to be their dedicated QA Wolf engineer and work exclusively with their team.

- **90%**: “90% of workflows have test coverage”
- **24 hour**: “24 hour turnaround for new test coverage”
- **20+**: “20+ deployments per week”
- **Sub-2-hour**: “Sub-2-hour resolution for failed tests”

> Having a dedicated QA Wolf expert integrated into our development team lets us focus on building our product with proper test coverage from day one, by combining our business context and QA Wolf’s testing expertise.
>
> Emil Sit, VP of Engineering

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure $300k+ is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Scope3.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Scope3.
- Checked: each number in our summary is printed on the page.
- Checked: Scope3 uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/scope3-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology