# How SealingTech uses mabl

**86%**: “86% Reduction in Testing Time: Testing with mabl greatly reduced manual and scripted approach times”

As published on [mabl.com](https://www.mabl.com/customer-stories/sealingtech-agentic-test-automation). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [SealingTech](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/sealingtech.md)
- Tool: [mabl](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/mabl.md)

## What the story says

SealingTech uses mabl's agentic test automation to create, run and maintain tests for its customer-facing applications, including a Kit Deployment Software product with complex drag-and-drop network diagrams. It also uses GenAI Assertions to validate its GenAI solution, Operator X.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and SealingTech, not ours.

> 4x Faster Test Creation: Test creation cycles were reduced to just 15 minutes, compared to 60 minutes (and multiple reworks) using traditional methods.

- **4x**: “4x Faster Test Creation: Test creation cycles were reduced to just 15 minutes, compared to 60 minutes (and multiple reworks) using traditional methods.”
- **80%**: “Beyond speed, the team was able to achieve 80% feature test coverage for their core products.”

> Using mabl, I was able to create, execute, and analyze a complete user test workflow in under 15 minutes. It would have taken me at least 60 minutes to complete this same process the old way.
>
> Brian Miller, SealingTech Test Automation Lead

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 86% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of SealingTech.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of SealingTech.
- Checked: SealingTech uses mabl. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/sealingtech-mabl · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology