# How Sevaka uses Vanta

**3 days**: “98% passing controls achieved in about 3 days of human effort”

As published on [vanta.com](https://www.vanta.com/customers/sevaka). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Sevaka](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/sevaka.md)
- Tool: [Vanta](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/vanta.md)
- Customer since (as the page says): VANTA CUSTOMER SINCE 2026

## What the story says

Sevaka connected Vanta to Claude via Vanta's MCP to identify risks, map controls, audit vendors and generate documentation for SOC 2 Type 2, and uses the Vanta Trust Center as its first response to enterprise security inquiries. It also found auditors and pentesters through Vanta's Partner Directory.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Vanta and Sevaka, not ours.

> By pairing Vanta's MCP with Claude AI, the Sevaka team built a repeatable, AI-accelerated compliance workflow that handled the heavy lifting without sacrificing ownership or accountability.

- **20x**: “98% passing controls achieved in about 3 days of human effort—20x faster than estimated without the Vanta MCP”
- **half**: “Pentesting and audit quotes came in at half the price of other providers”
- **half**: “Cost savings effectively offset half the cost of the Vanta platform”

> Vanta made compliance manageable for us,
>
> Matthew Hare, Co-founder & CTO, Sevaka

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 3 days is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Sevaka.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Sevaka.
- Checked: each number in our summary is printed on the page.
- Checked: Sevaka uses Vanta. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/sevaka-vanta · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology