# How Shopmonkey uses QA Wolf

**$600K**: “Offset the need to hire 6+ test automation engineers, saving more than $600K/yr.”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/shopmonkey). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Shopmonkey](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/shopmonkey.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: Engineering

## What the story says

Shopmonkey uses QA Wolf to build and run a new end-to-end regression test suite for the ground-up rebuild (v2) of its auto repair shop management platform. QA Wolf's service replaced the in-house testing effort, which would have required hiring several test automation engineers.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Shopmonkey, not ours.

> After experimenting with in-house regression testing, Shopmonkey estimated that they would need to hire at least six full-time staff to build and maintain the test coverage they were looking for. With QA Wolf, their QA costs are 20% of what they would otherwise have been.

- **80%**: “80% reduction in test run time compared to the in-house suite.”
- **200**: “Ramped from 0 to 200 automated tests in less than three months.”
- **20%**: “With QA Wolf, their QA costs are 20% of what they would otherwise have been.”

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure $600K is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Shopmonkey.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Shopmonkey.
- Checked: each number in our summary is printed on the page.
- Checked: Shopmonkey uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/shopmonkey-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology