# How Tamr uses mabl

**80%**: “Cost Savings: Tamr achieved an 80% cost reduction by replacing four full-time automators with mabl.”

As published on [mabl.com](https://www.mabl.com/customer-stories/tamr-transforms-software-quality-with-mabl). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-09.

- Company: [Tamr](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/tamr.md)
- Tool: [mabl](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/mabl.md)
- Industry: [Data & Analytics](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/industry/data-analytics.md)
- Teams: Engineering, QA

## What the story says

Tamr replaced daily manual UI testing and earlier in-house and external automation tools with automated mabl tests for its end-to-end workflows. This let the development team release software daily and spend less time on test maintenance.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and Tamr, not ours.

> Cost Savings: Tamr achieved an 80% cost reduction by replacing four full-time automators with mabl.

- **100%**: “Complete Test Coverage: 100% of end-to-end workflows are now covered by mabl tests, eliminating the need for updates.”
- **less than 10 minutes**: “Time Savings: Test creation and updates that once took a full day or more now take less than 10 minutes with mabl.”
- **63**: “In the same period a year later, using mabl, they detected 63 bugs.”
- **117%**: “117% increase in bug detection”

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-09.

- Checked: the figure 80% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Tamr.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Tamr.
- Checked: Tamr uses mabl. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-09.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/tamr-mabl · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology