# How Taskrabbit uses CodeRabbit

**25%**: “Over 25% reduction in time to merge”

As published on [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/taskrabbit-cut-merge-time-by-25-before-adopting-coding-agents). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-06.

- Company: [Taskrabbit](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/taskrabbit.md)
- Tool: [CodeRabbit](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/coderabbit.md)
- Industry: [Marketplace](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/industry/marketplace.md)

## What the story says

Taskrabbit uses CodeRabbit as an AI first-pass reviewer on pull requests across most of its repositories, including its central Ruby monolith. It gives its globally distributed engineering teams immediate feedback at any hour, so human reviewers can focus on more substantive issues.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of CodeRabbit and Taskrabbit, not ours.

> Kiran reported a reduction from an average of 10 days to 7 days, representing an improvement of over 25%.

- **300**: “With over 300 PRs pushed through CodeRabbit each week, the impact is enormous.”
- **100**: “thereby maintaining consistency across their entire team of over 100 engineers.”

> I feel like CodeRabbit is solving the code review problem, and that was attractive, I was thinking, why not solve that problem before we use a coding tool?
>
> Kiran Kanagasekar, Senior Engineering Manager

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-06.

- Checked: the figure 25% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Taskrabbit.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Taskrabbit.
- Checked: Taskrabbit uses CodeRabbit. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-06.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/taskrabbit-coderabbit · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology