# How Thirty Madison uses QA Wolf

**$1M+**: “$1M+ saved per year in QA engineering costs”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/thirty-madison). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Thirty Madison](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/thirty-madison.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: Engineering, Product

## What the story says

Thirty Madison uses QA Wolf to build and maintain end-to-end test coverage for web and mobile workflows while replatforming two systems into one after an acquisition. The tests cover patient intake, clinical workflows, and pharmacy delivery, replacing manual regression work and avoiding an in-house QA team.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Thirty Madison, not ours.

> By working with QA Wolf instead, Thirty Madison avoided hiring a dedicated QA team—saving an estimated $800,000 to $1.25 million annually.

- **10x**: “200 test cases to 2,000 — a 10x increase — in less than a year”
- **20%**: “20% of developer time reclaimed from slow QA cycles”
- **1–2 days**: “1–2 days additional capacity per engineer”

> We knew replatforming was going to be a massive lift. And we also knew that any slip in quality could impact patient safety, which is something we can’t compromise on.
>
> Achin Batra, CTO

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure $1M+ is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Thirty Madison.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Thirty Madison.
- Checked: Thirty Madison uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/thirty-madison-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology