# How Trivago uses CodeRabbit

**2.07 weeks**: “CodeRabbit saved an estimated 2.07 weeks of reviewer time during a recent 90-day period.”

As published on [coderabbit.ai](https://www.coderabbit.ai/case-studies/trivago-raises-the-floor-for-code-review-with-coderabbit). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-06.

- Company: [Trivago](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/trivago.md)
- Tool: [CodeRabbit](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/coderabbit.md)
- Industry: [Travel & Hospitality](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/industry/travel-hospitality.md)
- Teams: Aegis web team, Engineering, Staff engineering, Engineering management

## What the story says

trivago's Aegis web team uses CodeRabbit to run an automated first-pass review on pull requests. Authors address its findings before requesting human review, so human reviewers can focus on architecture and product logic while CodeRabbit reinforces codebase conventions and catches functional errors.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of CodeRabbit and Trivago, not ours.

> CodeRabbit saved an estimated 2.07 weeks of reviewer time during a recent 90-day period. It handled a thorough first pass so human reviewers could concentrate on architecture, product logic, and the broader implications of a change.

- **66.7%**: “Peak critical-severity acceptance rate of 66.7%”
- **43.4%**: “Developers accepted 43.4% of 1,620 CodeRabbit review comments.”
- **1,160**: “CodeRabbit supported 1,160 merged pull requests in the measured view.”
- **7.18 hours**: “Median time to merge was 7.18 hours, with a median of 1.67 hours between the last commit and merge.”

> CodeRabbit doesn’t get tired. It doesn’t skip over things. It doesn’t miss things.
>
> Thomas Bartel, Engineering Manager, Aegis Web Team

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-06.

- Checked: the figure 2.07 weeks is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Trivago.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Trivago.
- Checked: Trivago uses CodeRabbit. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-06.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/trivago-n-v-coderabbit · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology