# How upcover uses Vanta

**~50%**: “CUT POTENTIAL COMPLIANCE COSTS BY ~50%”

As published on [vanta.com](https://www.vanta.com/customers/upcover). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-17.

- Company: [upcover](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/upcover.md)
- Tool: [Vanta](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/vanta.md)
- Teams: Leadership

## What the story says

upcover, a small AI-native commercial insurance broker, uses Vanta's automated compliance platform to pursue SOC 2 Type 2 certification in-house without a dedicated security hire. It also uses Vanta's Trust Center to show prospects its security posture and SOC 2 progress.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Vanta and upcover, not ours.

> Once upcover determined Vanta provided a faster path to certification than consultants did and that the total cost was about half as much as MSSPs and consultants estimated, the decision was easy.

> We started to speak to Vanta and realized that we could do it in-house. We could do it ourselves with the templates Vanta provided and work with one of their recommended auditors.
>
> Skye Theodorou, Co-founder & CEO, upcover

Source: [vanta.com](https://www.vanta.com/customers/upcover), captured 2026-10-17.

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-17.

- Checked: the figure ~50% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of upcover.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of upcover.
- Checked: each number in our summary is printed on the page.
- Checked: upcover uses Vanta. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-17.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/upcover-vanta · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology