# How VAPI uses Juicebox

**\>$100K**: “\>$100K SAVED ON EXECUTIVE SEARCH FEES”

As published on [juicebox.ai](https://juicebox.ai/customers/vapi). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [VAPI](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/vapi.md)
- Tool: [Juicebox](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/juicebox.md)
- Industry: [Artificial Intelligence](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/industry/artificial-intelligence.md)
- Teams: engineering, design, sales

## What the story says

Vapi uses Juicebox as its in-house recruiting platform, running candidate searches, shared hiring projects and personalized outbound email sequences. Founders, hiring managers and recruiters collaborated in it to fill leadership and individual contributor roles without an executive search firm.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Juicebox and VAPI, not ours.

> Among the hires made was a VP of Engineering—a role that typically commands a $100,000–$150,000 executive search fee. By keeping this work in-house, Vapi saved significant budget, while remaining full in control of the process.

- **3,500+**: “3,500+ PERSONALIZED OUTBOUND EMAILS SENT”
- **70%+**: “70%+ OPEN RATE FROM EMAIL CAMPAIGNS”
- **12%**: “Achieved a 70% open rate and 12% interested rate”

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure \>$100K is printed word for word on the page, near the name of VAPI.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of VAPI.
- Checked: VAPI uses Juicebox. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/vapi-juicebox · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology