# How Vesta uses QA Wolf

**$480K+/yr**: “QA Wolf saves Vesta $480K+/yr by maintaining 60% E2E test coverage”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/vesta). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Vesta](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/vesta.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: Engineering, Product

## What the story says

Vesta, a mortgage loan origination platform, uses QA Wolf to build and maintain end-to-end regression tests that run in its continuous deployment pipeline. Developers or product managers share video clips of flows, and QA Wolf adds tests for them.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Vesta, not ours.

> With QA Wolf integrated into their deployment pipeline, Vesta can check for regressions nightly and make sure that they can move fast without breaking the features that their customers depend on.

- **60%**: “Automated 60% of E2E workflows in 4 months”
- **5 minutes**: “Daily regression tests completed in less than 5 minutes”
- **4+**: “Replaced the need to hire and train 4+ QA engineers”

> It would definitely cost us at least 3x the cost of QA Wolf to build a team of in-house QA engineers.
>
> Devon Yang, co-founder & CTO

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure $480K+/yr is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Vesta.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Vesta.
- Checked: Vesta uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/vesta-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology