# How Vividly uses QA Wolf

**75%**: “Vividly reached 75% test coverage within four months”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/vividly). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Vividly](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/vividly.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: QA, Engineering, DevOps

## What the story says

Vividly, a trade management software company for CPG businesses, partnered with QA Wolf to build and run end-to-end test automation in place of slow, error-prone manual testing. This lets its QA engineers focus on performance, load, and exploratory testing while the old system stays covered during a product refactor.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Vividly, not ours.

> With .5% UAT and regression test coverage, Vividly was desperate for a new solution. By partnering with QA Wolf, Vividly reached 75% test coverage within four months.

- **2-4 days**: “As a small start-up, Vividly was frustrated with their error-prone manual testing that would take 2-4 days to complete, draining their team of time and resources.”

> Knowing there is a team of engineers that is effectively an extension of my team to help build out end-to-end tests is very useful.
>
> Brian Wu, DevOps Team Lead

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 75% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Vividly.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Vividly.
- Checked: Vividly uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/vividly-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology