# How Xima uses QA Wolf

**20%**: “20% more time spent on feature engineering”

As published on [qawolf.com](https://www.qawolf.com/customers/xima). Captured by usedby on 2026-10-07.

- Company: [Xima](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/xima.md)
- Tool: [QA Wolf](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/qa-wolf.md)
- Teams: Engineering, QA

## What the story says

Xima uses QA Wolf to build, run and maintain its automated end-to-end tests, replacing an in-house Cypress suite and manual regression testing. This frees its developers from writing and maintaining tests so they can focus on product features.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of QA Wolf and Xima, not ours.

> Developers that were spending 1–2 days each sprint writing automated tests for the next release can now focus on the product—work they actually want to do.

- **3**: “Avoided hiring 3 additional QA engineers”
- **95%**: “Converted 200+ tests—95% of workflows—from Cypress to Playwright in 4 months‍”

> I would definitely recommend QA Wolf for any software that has multiple modules that have to integrate together or have to work with third-party APIs.
>
> Ed St. Louis, VP of Engineering

## What usedby checked

We compared the story with its live page on 2026-10-07.

- Checked: the figure 20% is printed word for word on the page, near the name of Xima.
- Checked: the passage quoted above is copied word for word from the page, near the name of Xima.
- Checked: Xima uses QA Wolf. Confirmed line. Latest check across sources: 2026-10-07.
- Not checked: the result itself. We quote it; we did not measure it.

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/xima-qa-wolf · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology