# Alex vs Humanly: who uses which

On usedby, 19 companies use Alex and 31 use Humanly. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-07: 49 of 50 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Alex](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/alex.md) | [Humanly](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/humanly.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 19 | 31 |
| Confirmed | 17 | 16 |
| Observed | 2 | 15 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | Marketing Tech (1), Schools & Universities (1) | Hospitals & Care Providers (4), Restaurants & Food Services (4), HR & Recruiting (3) |
| Category | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Alex: [Orange Tree Staffing](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/orange-tree-staffing-alex.md): **20–30%**: “recruiters report reclaiming 20–30% of their time” (published 2026-07-29)
- Alex: [Akraya](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/akraya-alex.md): **15,000 hours**: “The firm estimates those interviews have saved 15,000 hours of screening time.” (published 2026-08-12)
- Humanly: [Valet Living](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/valet-living-humanly.md): **19 hours**: “Average time to complete screening 19 hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- Humanly: [Fleet Feet](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/fleet-feet-humanly.md): **six hours**: “Automated outreach and screening reduced average response time to just six hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/alex-vs-humanly · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology