# Assembled vs Glia: who uses which

On usedby, 39 companies use Assembled and 10 use Glia. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-08: 49 of 49 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Assembled](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/assembled.md) | [Glia](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/glia.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 39 | 10 |
| Confirmed | 21 | 5 |
| Observed | 18 | 5 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | Fintech & Payments (6), DevTools & Infrastructure (3), Marketing Tech (3) | — |
| Category | Customer Service Automation | Customer Service Automation |
| Security | SOC 2 Type II ([assembled.com](https://www.assembled.com/security), checked 2026-10-08) | — |
| Pricing | CORE: $25 /MONTH; PRO: $45 /MONTH; ENTERPRISE: $75 /MONTH ([assembled.com](https://www.assembled.com/pricing), checked 2026-10-08) | — |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Assembled: [NEXT Insurance](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/next-insurance-assembled.md): **$957K**: “Through improved schedule adherence alone, NEXT Insurance has already saved $957K.” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Assembled: [Preply](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/preply-assembled.md): **60%**: “average handle time has dropped by 60%” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Glia: [Live Oak Bank](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/live-oak-bank-glia.md): **793%**: “Increase deposit retention by nearly 9x, up from $1.4 million in month one to $12.5 million at its peak—a 793% increase.” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Glia: [Thomaston Savings Bank](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/thomaston-savings-bank-glia.md): story without a checked figure. (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/assembled-vs-glia · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology