# AWS Bedrock vs Nebius AI Cloud: who uses which

On usedby, 26 companies use AWS Bedrock and 48 use Nebius AI Cloud. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-07: 69 of 74 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [AWS Bedrock](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/aws-bedrock.md) | [Nebius AI Cloud](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/nebius.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 26 | 48 |
| Confirmed | 20 | 35 |
| Observed | 4 | 13 |
| Signals (job posts) | 2 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | Marketing Tech (4), Airlines & Aviation Services (2), Automotive Manufacturing (2) | Artificial Intelligence (2), Cybersecurity (1), DevTools & Infrastructure (1) |
| Category | LLM Inference | LLM Inference |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- AWS Bedrock: [Condé Nast](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/conde-nast-aws-bedrock.md): **minutes**: “Content rights management processes that previously required weeks of manual legal and licensing review now finish in minutes” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- AWS Bedrock: [Blue Origin](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/blue-origin-aws-bedrock.md): **90%**: “Reduce hardware development by 90% — from years to days, concept to printed part” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- Nebius AI Cloud: [TrialHub](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/trialhub-nebius.md): **50%**: “TrialHub reduces the time spent on feasibility assessments by 50%” (captured by usedby 2026-10-07)
- Nebius AI Cloud: [Krisp](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/krisp-nebius.md): **50–80%**: “a single H100 GPU completed the training process 50–80% faster than the A100 GPU” (captured by usedby 2026-10-07)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/aws-bedrock-vs-nebius · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology