# Bito vs Warp: who uses which

On usedby, 16 companies use Bito and 17 use Warp. 1 company uses both, including Anthropic. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-06: 32 of 33 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Bito](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/bito.md) | [Warp](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/warp.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 16 | 17 |
| Confirmed | 9 | 2 |
| Observed | 7 | 15 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of named customers (confirmed or observed) | Airlines & Aviation Services (3), Advertising & AdTech (2), Artificial Intelligence (2) | DevTools & Infrastructure (5), Artificial Intelligence (4), Crypto & Web3 (1) |
| Category | AI Code Assistants | AI Code Editors |
| Security | SOC 2 Type II ([bito.ai](https://bito.ai/enterprise/security/), checked 2026-10-07) | SOC 2 Type II ([warp.dev](https://www.warp.dev/legal/security), checked 2026-10-07) |
| Free trial | Free trial or free plan available. ([bito.ai](https://bito.ai/pricing/), checked 2026-10-07) | — |
| Pricing | Professional: contact sales; Enterprise: contact sales ([bito.ai](https://bito.ai/pricing/), checked 2026-10-07) | Free: $0 /month; Build: $18 /month; Max: $180 /month; Business: $45 /user /month; Enterprise: contact sales ([warp.dev](https://www.warp.dev/pricing), checked 2026-10-07) |
| Data residency | — | United States ([warp.dev](https://www.warp.dev/legal/security), checked 2026-10-07) |
| Data processing terms | — | A data processing agreement is available. ([warp.dev](https://www.warp.dev/legal/data-processing-addendum), checked 2026-10-07) |

## Companies named on both

Confirmed or observed on each side.

| Company |
|---|
| [Anthropic](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/anthropic.md) |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Bito: [Privado](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/privado-bito.md): **2 hours**: “Over 2 hours saved per developer per day” (published 2025-06-03)
- Bito: [Apica](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/apica-bito.md): **83%**: “achieving 83% faster pull request cycles” (published 2025-09-15)
- Warp: [Rectangle Health](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/rectangle-health-warp.md): **3 to 10 minutes**: “a typical turnaround of 3 to 10 minutes from Slack @mention to a clickable pull request” (published 2026-06-22)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/bito-vs-warp · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology