# Browserbase vs Speakeasy: who uses which

On usedby, 25 companies use Browserbase and 47 use Speakeasy. 1 company uses both, including Vercel. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included; each company keeps its proof level on each side. Latest check 2026-11-12: 72 of 72 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Browserbase](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/browserbase.md) | [Speakeasy](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/speakeasy.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 25 | 47 |
| Confirmed | 0 | 19 |
| Observed | 24 | 27 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers (every proof level) | Artificial Intelligence (7), DevTools & Infrastructure (4), Fintech & Payments (3) | DevTools & Infrastructure (8), Artificial Intelligence (5), Data & Analytics (4) |
| Category | Agent frameworks & AI gateways | Agent frameworks & AI gateways |
| Security | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA ([trust.browserbase.com](https://trust.browserbase.com/), checked 2026-10-27) | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 ([speakeasy.com](https://www.speakeasy.com/security), checked 2026-11-13) |
| Free trial | Free trial or free plan available. ([browserbase.com](https://www.browserbase.com/pricing), checked 2026-10-27) | — |
| Pricing | Free Plan: $0 /mo; Developer Plan: $20 /mo; Startup Plan: $99 /mo; Scale Plan: contact sales ([browserbase.com](https://www.browserbase.com/pricing), checked 2026-10-27) | Pay as you go · $0.35 / million stored session tokens, $0.99 / million tokens scanned for risk ([speakeasy.com](https://www.speakeasy.com/pricing), checked 2026-11-13) |
| Data processing terms | — | A data processing agreement is available. ([speakeasy.com](https://www.speakeasy.com/product/agent-security), checked 2026-11-13) |
| Integrations | — | Anthropic, OpenAI, Cursor, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, LiteLLM, Tailscale, Datadog, Grafana Cloud, Langfuse, Microsoft Entra ID, Jamf ([speakeasy.com](https://www.speakeasy.com/docs/ai-control-plane/integrations), checked 2026-11-13) |

## Companies that use both

Every proof level counts; the proof level of each side is shown, strongest proofs first. The first public proof is not an adoption date.

| Company | Proof, Browserbase | Proof, Speakeasy | First public proof, Browserbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Vercel](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/vercel.md) | Observed | Observed | On or before October 2024 |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Speakeasy: [Formance](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/formance-speakeasy.md): **5 hours/week**: “We had one developer spending at least 5 hours/week generating new SDKs for every API release.” (captured by usedby 2026-11-12)
- Speakeasy: [Epilot](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/epilot-speakeasy.md): **8X**: “8X reduction in expected cost of Terraform Provider” (captured by usedby 2026-11-12)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/browserbase-vs-speakeasy · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology