# Celonis vs Within: who uses which

On usedby, 53 companies use Celonis and 16 use Within. 1 company uses both, including Uber. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included; each company keeps its proof level on each side. Latest check 2026-10-19: 69 of 69 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Celonis](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/celonis.md) | [Within](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/within.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 53 | 16 |
| Confirmed | 51 | 5 |
| Observed | 2 | 11 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers (every proof level) | Manufacturing (12), Energy, Utilities & Cleantech (7), Biotech & Pharma (5) | Artificial Intelligence (2), Fintech & Payments (2), Sales Tech & CRM (2) |
| Category | Document & process intelligence | Document & process intelligence |
| Security | CSA STAR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, TISAX, Cyber Essentials ([trust.celonis.com](https://trust.celonis.com/), checked 2026-10-08) | SOC 2 Type II ([within.ai](https://www.within.ai/trust), checked 2026-10-08) |
| Data processing terms | A data processing agreement is available. ([trust.celonis.com](https://trust.celonis.com/), checked 2026-10-08) | — |
| Integrations | SAP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle, Service Now ([marketplace.celonis.com](https://marketplace.celonis.com/store/ui/discover), checked 2026-10-08) | — |

## Companies that use both

Every proof level counts; the proof level of each side is shown, strongest proofs first. The first public proof is not an adoption date.

| Company | Proof, Celonis | Proof, Within | First public proof, Celonis | First public proof, Within |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Uber](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/uber.md) | Confirmed | Observed | On or before October 2026 | On or before August 2026 |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Celonis: [Vinmar](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/vinmar-international-celonis.md): **20%**: “Increased operational visibility plus smart automation have led to a 20% productivity increase.” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Celonis: [Cosentino](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/cosentino-celonis.md): **28 days**: “Up to 28 days reduction in order cycle time” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Within: [Accelirate](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/accelirate-within.md): **67%**: “With Within, Accelirate cut PDD creation time by 67% for simple workflows” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Within: [Doordash](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/doordash-within.md): **3,800+**: “3,800+ processes documented and analyzed across entire accounting organization” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/celonis-vs-within · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology