# Coveo vs Pinecone: who uses which

On usedby, 46 companies use Coveo and 57 use Pinecone. 2 companies use both, including Adobe and Cisco. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included; each company keeps its proof level on each side. Latest check 2026-10-12: 102 of 103 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Coveo](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/coveo.md) | [Pinecone](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/pinecone.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 46 | 57 |
| Confirmed | 37 | 15 |
| Observed | 9 | 41 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 1 |
| Top industries of customers (every proof level) | Consumer Goods (5), Manufacturing (5), Cybersecurity (3) | Artificial Intelligence (15), DevTools & Infrastructure (5), Data & Analytics (4) |
| Category | Vector databases & search engines | Vector databases & search engines |
| Data processing terms | — | A data processing agreement is available. ([pinecone.io](https://www.pinecone.io/legal/data-processing-addendum/), checked 2026-10-04) |
| Integrations | — | Airbyte, Amazon Bedrock, Amazon Sagemaker, Cohere, Databricks, Datadog, LangChain, Llama Index, OpenAI, Snowflake, Terraform, Vercel ([docs.pinecone.io](https://docs.pinecone.io/integrations/overview), checked 2026-10-04) |
| Pricing | — | Starter: Free; Builder: $20 month flat; Standard: $50 month min. usage; Enterprise: $500 month min. usage; Bring your own cloud: contact sales ([pinecone.io](https://www.pinecone.io/pricing/), checked 2026-10-04) |

## Companies that use both

Every proof level counts; the proof level of each side is shown, strongest proofs first. The first public proof is not an adoption date.

| Company | Proof, Coveo | Proof, Pinecone | First public proof, Coveo | First public proof, Pinecone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Adobe](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/adobe.md) | Observed | Observed | On or before October 2024 | On or before March 2026 |
| [Cisco](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/cisco.md) | Observed | Observed | On or before April 2025 | On or before October 2024 |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Coveo: [F5](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/f5-coveo-3.md): **50+**: “all 50+ of F5’s client-facing web properties are unified to deliver one continuous digital journey” (captured by usedby 2026-10-10)
- Coveo: [F5](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/f5-coveo-2.md): **$150,000+**: “$150,000+ saved by deflecting unnecessary support requests” (captured by usedby 2026-10-09)
- Pinecone: [TaskUs](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/taskus-pinecone.md): **20%**: “a 20% reduction in AHT for voice calls” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Pinecone: [Assembled](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/assembled-pinecone.md): **~95%**: “a ~95% reduction of time, freeing up human agents to focus on more complex issues” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/coveo-vs-pinecone · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology