# Findem vs Humanly: who uses which

On usedby, 15 companies use Findem and 31 use Humanly. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-07: 45 of 46 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Findem](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/findem.md) | [Humanly](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/humanly.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 15 | 31 |
| Confirmed | 7 | 16 |
| Observed | 8 | 15 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | Data & Analytics (1), DevTools & Infrastructure (1), Fintech & Payments (1) | Hospitals & Care Providers (4), Restaurants & Food Services (4), HR & Recruiting (3) |
| Category | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition |
| Data processing terms | A data processing agreement is available. ([trust.findem.ai](https://trust.findem.ai/resources?s=n7l858orxkidow6l1kxp9&amp;name=privacy-policy), checked 2026-10-07) | — |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Findem: [Amplitude](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/amplitude-findem.md): **21%**: “Decreased time to fill by 21% in year one, reducing the average from 57 to 45 days.” (published 2026-08-21)
- Findem: [Drive Capital](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/drive-capital-findem.md): **50%**: “50% of hires sourced directly through Findem” (published 2026-08-21)
- Humanly: [Valet Living](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/valet-living-humanly.md): **19 hours**: “Average time to complete screening 19 hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- Humanly: [Fleet Feet](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/fleet-feet-humanly.md): **six hours**: “Automated outreach and screening reduced average response time to just six hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/findem-vs-humanly · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology
