# Hugging Face vs Labelbox: who uses which

On usedby, 9 companies use Hugging Face and 29 use Labelbox. 1 company uses both, including Meta. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-07: 38 of 38 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Hugging Face](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/hugging-face.md) | [Labelbox](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/labelbox.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 9 | 29 |
| Confirmed | 0 | 20 |
| Observed | 8 | 9 |
| Signals (job posts) | 1 | 0 |
| Top industries of named customers (confirmed or observed) | Artificial Intelligence (3), DevTools & Infrastructure (1), E-commerce & D2C (1) | Media & Publishing (2), Advertising & AdTech (1), Aerospace & Defense (1) |
| Category | ML Ops & Training | ML Ops & Training |
| Pricing | PRO: $9 /month; Team: $20 /month per user; Enterprise: $50 /month per user ([huggingface.co](https://huggingface.co/pricing), checked 2026-10-08) | — |

## Companies named on both

Confirmed or observed on each side.

| Company |
|---|
| [Meta](https://www.usedby.ai/companies/meta.md) |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Labelbox: [Move AI](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/move-ai-labelbox.md): **2x**: “moving 2x as fast in this domain and accelerating its go-to-market and product launches” (captured by usedby 2026-10-07)
- Labelbox: [Blue River Technology](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/blue-river-technology-labelbox.md): **50%**: “cut average processing times to create training data by 50%” (captured by usedby 2026-10-07)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/hugging-face-vs-labelbox · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology