# Humanly vs Paradox: who uses which

On usedby, 31 companies use Humanly and 39 use Paradox. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-03: 68 of 70 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Humanly](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/humanly.md) | [Paradox](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/paradox.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 31 | 39 |
| Confirmed | 16 | 36 |
| Observed | 15 | 3 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | Hospitals & Care Providers (4), Restaurants & Food Services (4), HR & Recruiting (3) | Retail (6), Restaurants & Food Services (5), Logistics & Supply Chain (3) |
| Category | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition |
| Data processing terms | — | A data processing agreement is available. ([paradox.ai](https://www.paradox.ai/legal/dpa), checked 2026-10-04) |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Humanly: [Valet Living](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/valet-living-humanly.md): **19 hours**: “Average time to complete screening 19 hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- Humanly: [Fleet Feet](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/fleet-feet-humanly.md): **six hours**: “Automated outreach and screening reduced average response time to just six hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- Paradox: [Compass Group](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/compass-group-paradox.md): **1:8000**: “Compass Group now has a 1:8000 recruiter-to-hire ratio.” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- Paradox: [Nestlé](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/nestle-paradox.md): **8K hours**: “8K hours saved annually.” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/humanly-vs-paradox · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology