# Humanly vs Phenom: who uses which

On usedby, 31 companies use Humanly and 32 use Phenom. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-07: 62 of 63 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Humanly](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/humanly.md) | [Phenom](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/phenom.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 31 | 32 |
| Confirmed | 16 | 17 |
| Observed | 15 | 15 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | Hospitals & Care Providers (4), Restaurants & Food Services (4), HR & Recruiting (3) | Consumer Goods (3), Airlines & Aviation Services (2), Biotech & Pharma (2) |
| Category | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition | Recruiting & Talent Acquisition |
| Security | — | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701 ([trust.phenom.com](https://trust.phenom.com/), checked 2026-10-07) |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Humanly: [Valet Living](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/valet-living-humanly.md): **19 hours**: “Average time to complete screening 19 hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)
- Humanly: [Fleet Feet](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/fleet-feet-humanly.md): **six hours**: “Automated outreach and screening reduced average response time to just six hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-03)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/humanly-vs-phenom · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology