# Ivo vs Supio: who uses which

On usedby, 25 companies use Ivo and 24 use Supio. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-08: 49 of 49 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Ivo](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/ivo.md) | [Supio](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/supio.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 25 | 24 |
| Confirmed | 14 | 19 |
| Observed | 11 | 5 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | Marketing Tech (3), Media & Publishing (3), DevTools & Infrastructure (2) | — |
| Category | Legal AI | Legal AI |
| Security | — | SOC 2 Type II ([supio.com](https://www.supio.com/security), checked 2026-10-08) |
| Integrations | — | Litify, SmartAdvocate, Casepeer, MyCase, Smokeball, Jove ([supio.com](https://www.supio.com/integrations), checked 2026-10-08) |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Ivo: [Sunrider](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/sunrider-ivo.md): **weeks to hours**: “Cut review time from weeks to hours” (captured by usedby 2026-10-07)
- Ivo: [Vantage Data Centers](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/vantage-data-centers-ivo.md): **4–5+ hours**: “Large GC and construction agreements: Saving 4–5+ hours per review” (captured by usedby 2026-10-07)
- Supio: [Phillips Law Group](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/phillips-law-group-supio-2.md): **17%**: “Phillips Law Group achieved 17% higher settlement values” (published 2026-07-14)
- Supio: [Phillips Law Group](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/phillips-law-group-supio.md): **2.7x**: “Each case earns 2.7x what the firm would have netted on a referral” (published 2026-10-07)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/ivo-vs-supio · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology