# Levelpath vs Pactum: who uses which

On usedby, 53 companies use Levelpath and 18 use Pactum. No company is listed with both yet. Counts include every proof level, job-post signals included. Companies named on both have a confirmed or observed line on each side. Latest check 2026-10-08: 71 of 71 public lines checked.

## Side by side

|  | [Levelpath](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/levelpath.md) | [Pactum](https://www.usedby.ai/tools/pactum.md) |
|---|---|---|
| Public customers | 53 | 18 |
| Confirmed | 16 | 5 |
| Observed | 37 | 13 |
| Signals (job posts) | 0 | 0 |
| Top industries of customers | IT Services & System Integration (2), Sales Tech & CRM (2), Airlines & Aviation Services (1) | Manufacturing (2), Biotech & Pharma (1), Energy, Utilities & Cleantech (1) |
| Category | Procurement & Sourcing | Procurement & Sourcing |
| Security | SOC 2 Type II ([trust.levelpath.com](https://trust.levelpath.com/), checked 2026-10-08) | — |
| Data processing terms | A data processing agreement is available. ([trust.levelpath.com](https://trust.levelpath.com/), checked 2026-10-08) | — |
| Integrations | SAP, Docusign, Oracle Netsuite, OneTrust, Oracle, Slack, Coupa, Microsoft Teams, Ironclad, Ariba, Ramp, Jira ([levelpath.com](https://www.levelpath.com/platform/integrations), checked 2026-10-08) | Coupa, SAP Ariba ([pactum.com](https://pactum.com/integrations), checked 2026-10-08) |

## Published results

Reviewed stories only; usedby did not measure the figures.

- Levelpath: [Emerald](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/emerald-levelpath.md): **50%**: “50% faster procurement cycle times by replacing fragmented tools with one centralized workflow” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)
- Levelpath: [Padnos](https://www.usedby.ai/case-studies/padnos-levelpath.md): **76%**: “Supplier and service requests now complete 76% faster than they did under the legacy system.” (captured by usedby 2026-10-08)

---
Source: https://www.usedby.ai/compare/levelpath-vs-pactum · How we check: https://www.usedby.ai/methodology