12 weeks
“CodeRabbit saved approximately 12 weeks of human reviewer effort.”
Tal como se publicó en coderabbit.ai. Capturado por usedby el 8 oct 2026.
Qué pasó
EarnIn uses CodeRabbit as an automated first-pass reviewer on pull requests across hundreds of GitHub repositories. It is combined with central configuration, repository-level guidance, and AST-grep rules so human reviewers can focus on architecture and risk in a regulated financial services environment.
Resumen escrito por usedby a partir de la página de origen, en inglés. Las cifras son de CodeRabbit y de EarnIn, no nuestras.
- 60%“CodeRabbit reviewed that stream with more than 8,000 comments and an overall acceptance rate of approximately 60%.”
- 5,000“Over a recent 90-day period, EarnIn merged more than 5,000 pull requests across hundreds of active repositories.”
- 1,000“In the first few weeks of the proof of concept, CodeRabbit reviewed more than 1,000 pull requests, and EarnIn engineers were already accepting a meaningful share of its suggestions.”
- 1.5 comments“CodeRabbit averaged roughly 1.5 comments per pull request, compared with roughly 2.0 comments from human reviewers.”
Across the same period, CodeRabbit saved approximately 12 weeks of human reviewer effort. For a distributed engineering organization operating hundreds of repositories, that recovered capacity creates more room for design discussions, platform work, and production readiness.
CodeRabbit scales reviews across hundreds of engineers and repos in a way manual review processes simply cannot. The measurable outcomes are real: solid acceptance ratios, quantified time savings, and consistent first-pass coverage for every PR.
Lo que dice la historia, y lo que verificamos
Comparamos la historia con su página en línea el 8 oct 2026.
- La cifra: 12 weeksVerificadoImpresa palabra por palabra en la página, cerca del nombre de EarnIn.
- El pasaje citado arribaVerificadoCopiado palabra por palabra de la página, cerca del nombre de EarnIn.
- EarnIn usa CodeRabbitVerificadoLínea de nivel Confirmado. Última verificación entre todas las fuentes: 8 oct 2026.
- El resultado en síNo verificadoLo citamos; no lo medimos.





