2.5x
“mabl proved to be 2.5x faster than Selenium for test creation”
Tal como se publicó en mabl.com. Capturado por usedby el 7 oct 2026.
Qué pasó
Workday's marketing team uses mabl to automate testing of its marketing portal, including authoring component tests on the Adobe Experience Management platform, replacing manual testing and Selenium scripts. Automated regression suites run at the end of each sprint and build verification suites run after each build.
Resumen escrito por usedby a partir de la página de origen, en inglés. Las cifras son de mabl y de Workday, no nuestras.
- 102 hours“Increased efficiency: mabl proved to be 2.5x faster than Selenium for test creation, enabling the team to create 246 tests in 4 PIs and save 102 hours.”
- $1,250“Cost savings: mabl has led to approximately $638 in savings per PI and $1,250 per release.”
- $20,000“In 2023 alone, Workday saved approximately $20,000 by catching bugs before they reached production.”
- 13 issues“Improved product quality: With increased test coverage and faster feedback loops, 13 issues were identified and resolved early on, preventing costly production bugs.”
Increased efficiency: mabl proved to be 2.5x faster than Selenium for test creation, enabling the team to create 246 tests in 4 PIs and save 102 hours.
Lo que dice la historia, y lo que verificamos
Comparamos la historia con su página en línea el 7 oct 2026.
- La cifra: 2.5xVerificadoImpresa palabra por palabra en la página, cerca del nombre de Workday.
- El pasaje citado arribaVerificadoCopiado palabra por palabra de la página, cerca del nombre de Workday.
- Workday usa mablVerificadoLínea de nivel Confirmado. Última verificación entre todas las fuentes: 7 oct 2026.
- El resultado en síNo verificadoLo citamos; no lo medimos.





