Data Methodology: Adoption data is based on public tech stack disclosures, job postings, case studies, and verified enterprise reports analyzed by UsedBy.ai. Showing 56 verified enterprise adoptions. More data being indexed continuously.
Decision Guide
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on real enterprise adoption patterns
UsedBy Exclusive Data
Industry Adoption Patterns
See which industries prefer each tool based on real adoption data
GitHub copilot by Industry
Data & Analytics8%
Logistics & Supply Chain8%
DevTools & Infrastructure8%
Automotive Manufacturing8%
Telecommunications8%
Cursor by Industry
Data & Analytics20%
Artificial Intelligence20%
Logistics & Supply Chain10%
DevTools & Infrastructure10%
Fintech & Payments10%
6 Companies Use Both
These enterprises have integrated both tools into their stack
GitHub copilot vs Cursor: Your Questions Answered
GitHub copilot has higher enterprise adoption with 36 companies using it, compared to 20 for Cursor. This suggests stronger market validation for GitHub copilot.
Yes, 6 companies in our database use both GitHub copilot and Cursor in their tech stack. This includes Stripe, Sendbird, Datadog. Using both tools together is a validated enterprise strategy.
GitHub copilot is particularly strong in Data & Analytics (8% of adopters), while Cursor dominates in Data & Analytics (20%). Choose based on your industry's prevailing stack.
For startups, consider: GitHub copilot offers subscription pricing with a free trial, while Cursor uses freemium pricing with a free trial available. Both are validated by enterprise use, ensuring scalability as you grow.
Related Comparisons
Explore more head-to-head matchups in this category
