Data Methodology: Adoption data is based on public tech stack disclosures, job postings, case studies, and verified enterprise reports analyzed by UsedBy.ai. Showing 24 verified enterprise adoptions. More data being indexed continuously.
Decision Guide
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on real enterprise adoption patterns
Choose Hugging Face if...
- You're in Artificial Intelligence (23% of users are)
- You want to try before buying (free trial available)
UsedBy Exclusive Data
Industry Adoption Patterns
See which industries prefer each tool based on real adoption data
Weights & Biases by Industry
Artificial Intelligence18%
Automotive Manufacturing9%
Media & Publishing9%
Sales Tech & CRM9%
Marketing Tech9%
Hugging Face by Industry
Artificial Intelligence23%
DevTools & Infrastructure15%
Cybersecurity8%
Telecommunications8%
Legal & Compliance8%
Real User Feedback
What Users Say
Testimonials from verified enterprise users
“Weights & Biases helps us manage thousands of ML experiments efficiently”
Meta AI
ML Engineering, Meta
No testimonials available yet
2 Companies Use Both
These enterprises have integrated both tools into their stack
Weights & Biases vs Hugging Face: Your Questions Answered
Hugging Face leads in enterprise adoption with 13 companies, versus 11 for Weights & Biases. This indicates broader market acceptance for Hugging Face.
Yes, 2 companies in our database use both Weights & Biases and Hugging Face in their tech stack. This includes Microsoft, Meta. Using both tools together is a validated enterprise strategy.
Weights & Biases is particularly strong in Artificial Intelligence (18% of adopters), while Hugging Face dominates in Artificial Intelligence (23%). Choose based on your industry's prevailing stack.
For startups, consider: Weights & Biases offers flexible pricing, while Hugging Face uses freemium pricing with a free trial available. Both are validated by enterprise use, ensuring scalability as you grow.
