Aller au contenu principal
usedby

$600K+/year

“Offset the need to hire six QA engineers, saving $600K+/year.”

Tel que publié sur qawolf.com. Capturé par usedby le 7 oct. 2026.

Ce qui s’est passé

AutoTrader uses QA Wolf to build, run and maintain an end-to-end automated test suite for its dealership CRM products. This replaced manual testing that had been done by customer support staff and let engineering release features faster without regressions.

Résumé rédigé par usedby à partir de la page source, en anglais. Les chiffres sont ceux de QA Wolf et de Autotrader, pas les nôtres.

  • 1,000 hours per year“Returned more than 1,000 hours per year to the customer support team, saving $20,000/year.”
  • 15–20%“Increased release velocity 15–20%.”
  • 15 minutes“Reduced QA cycles from 3+ days to 15 minutes.”
  • $20,000“we’ve returned more than 1,000 hours per year to that team—the equivalent of $20,000 in misallocated salary.”

QA Wolf built, runs, and maintains a test suite that AutoTrader would need six full-time QA engineers and QA managers to support internally, freeing up resources that can be used for product engineering and deliver even more value to customers.

Extrait de la page. qawolf.com, capturée le 7 oct. 2026

Some projects were even called “eternal projects.” Developers would move on to other projects before the testers could go over everything. Sometimes features would lay around for four months before they were released. It was making developers really unhappy, and slowing down our business strategy.

Jocelyn Deslauriers, VP of Engineering, Autotrader. Source, capturée le 7 oct. 2026

Ce que dit le témoignage, et ce que nous avons vérifié

Nous avons comparé le témoignage à sa page en ligne le 7 oct. 2026.

  • Le chiffre : $600K+/yearVérifiéImprimé mot pour mot sur la page, près du nom de Autotrader.
  • L’extrait cité plus hautVérifiéCopié mot pour mot depuis la page, près du nom de Autotrader.
  • Autotrader utilise QA WolfVérifiéLigne de niveau Confirmé. Dernière vérification, toutes sources confondues : 7 oct. 2026.
  • Le résultat lui-mêmeNon vérifiéNous le citons ; nous ne l’avons pas mesuré.

Même entreprise, même outil ou même secteur.

nearly 100%“the team reached nearly 100% test coverage in four months”Bubble utilise QA Wolf. Un autre client de QA Wolf86%“Drata secured 86% faster QA cycles”Drata utilise QA Wolf. Un autre client de QA Wolf$642K/year“Doubling GUIDEcx’s existing E2E test coverage saved more than $642K/year”GUIDEcx utilise QA Wolf. Un autre client de QA Wolf