The use case: how Jack & Jill deploys TypeSafe AI
Jack & Jill, a talent marketplace run by AI agents, replaced Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite with Jev for the candidate scoring stage of its matching pipeline.
More reported results
Figures published in TypeSafe AI’s case study. They are not independently measured by usedby.
$265K
Jack & Jill will save $265K a year
In the customer’s words
We saved ~half a million dollars last week with Jev.Other companies using TypeSafe AI
Customers across industries, with public evidence.
See all TypeSafe AI customers
Go straight to the source
Based on TypeSafe AI’s published case study. We check the public evidence; the results are reported by the vendor.
typesafe.ai- Last checked
- Oct 27, 2026
Open source capture What the story claims, and what we checked
What we compared with the page.
- The figure: 88%Checked
Printed word for word on the page, near the name of Jack & Jill.
- The passage quoted aboveChecked
Copied word for word from the page, near the name of Jack & Jill.
- The numbers in our summaryChecked
Each one is printed on the page.
- Jack & Jill uses TypeSafe AIChecked
Confirmed line.
- The result itselfNot checked
We quote it; we did not measure it.
Compared to Gemini, Jev maintained the same level of accuracy, with 88% lower cost and roughly 50% faster task completion time.