The use case: how PuppyGraph deploys XBOW
PuppyGraph moved all of its penetration testing to XBOW after XBOW found critical vulnerabilities that a previous provider missed. It now uses XBOW for continuous pentesting aligned with its release cycles instead of periodic assessments.
In the customer’s words
After working with XBOW, it was clear that their approach to security was a much better fit for our needs.Before working with XBOW, we relied on a different pentest provider. Their findings lacked depth. Key vulnerabilities remained undetected, leaving us with a false sense of security. Additionally, while we leveraged other security tools like SAST and DAST solutions, they didn't provide the same level of real-world attack simulation that a strong pentest should deliver.Other companies using XBOW
Customers across industries, with public evidence.
See all XBOW customers
Go straight to the source
Based on XBOW’s published case study. We check the public evidence; the results are reported by the vendor.
xbow.com- Source published
- Dec 17, 2025
- Last checked
- Nov 8, 2026
Open source capture What the story claims, and what we checked
What we compared with the page.
- The figure: less than 2 daysChecked
Printed word for word on the page, near the name of PuppyGraph.
- The passage quoted aboveChecked
Copied word for word from the page, near the name of PuppyGraph.
- The publication dateChecked
Read from the page’s own metadata, never guessed.
- PuppyGraph uses XBOWChecked
Confirmed line.
- The result itselfNot checked
We quote it; we did not measure it.
As a result, we’ve decided to move all our pentesting needs to XBOW and shift from periodic assessments to a more continuous testing approach aligned with our release cycles.