86%
“86% Reduction in Testing Time: Testing with mabl greatly reduced manual and scripted approach times”
As published on mabl.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 7, 2026.
What happened
SealingTech uses mabl's agentic test automation to create, run and maintain tests for its customer-facing applications, including a Kit Deployment Software product with complex drag-and-drop network diagrams. It also uses GenAI Assertions to validate its GenAI solution, Operator X.
Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and SealingTech, not ours.
- 4x“4x Faster Test Creation: Test creation cycles were reduced to just 15 minutes, compared to 60 minutes (and multiple reworks) using traditional methods.”
- 80%“Beyond speed, the team was able to achieve 80% feature test coverage for their core products.”
4x Faster Test Creation: Test creation cycles were reduced to just 15 minutes, compared to 60 minutes (and multiple reworks) using traditional methods.
Using mabl, I was able to create, execute, and analyze a complete user test workflow in under 15 minutes. It would have taken me at least 60 minutes to complete this same process the old way.
What the story claims, and what we checked
We compared the story with its live page on Oct 7, 2026.
- The figure: 86%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of SealingTech.
- The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of SealingTech.
- SealingTech uses mablCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 7, 2026.
- The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.




