80%
“Cost Savings: Tamr achieved an 80% cost reduction by replacing four full-time automators with mabl.”
As published on mabl.com. Checked by usedby on Oct 9, 2026.
What happened
Tamr replaced daily manual UI testing and earlier in-house and external automation tools with automated mabl tests for its end-to-end workflows. This let the development team release software daily and spend less time on test maintenance.
Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and Tamr, not ours.
- 100%“Complete Test Coverage: 100% of end-to-end workflows are now covered by mabl tests, eliminating the need for updates.”
- less than 10 minutes“Time Savings: Test creation and updates that once took a full day or more now take less than 10 minutes with mabl.”
- 63“In the same period a year later, using mabl, they detected 63 bugs.”
- 117%“117% increase in bug detection”
Cost Savings: Tamr achieved an 80% cost reduction by replacing four full-time automators with mabl.
What the story claims, and what we checked
What we compared with the page.
- The figure: 80%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Tamr.
- The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Tamr.
- Tamr uses mablCheckedConfirmed line.
- The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.
More stories
Same company, same tool or same industry.
3x“3x faster test creation”Arch Insurance Group uses mabl. Another customer of mabl94%“representing a 94% reduction in manual effort”Chorus Innovations uses mabl. Another customer of mabl12 hours“saves analysts around 12 hours every month on reporting tasks alone”Fivetran uses Pigment. Same industry: Data & Analytics
