Skip to main content
usedby

94%

“representing a 94% reduction in manual effort”

As published on mabl.com. Checked by usedby on Oct 9, 2026.

What happened

Chorus Innovations, a digital health platform with complex user flows, uses mabl to replace manual regression testing with automated end-to-end tests. The QA team built a suite of over 400 automated tests covering a significant portion of the platform.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of mabl and Chorus Innovations, not ours.

  • 120 hours“Before mabl, Chorus relied solely on manual regression testing, taking a staggering 120 hours per release cycle.”
  • 400“Increased Coverage: The Chorus team built a suite of over 400 automated end-to-end tests, covering a significant portion of the platform's features.”

Reduced Regression Time: Regression testing was significantly reduced, representing a 94% reduction in manual effort.

From the page. mabl.com

What the story claims, and what we checked

What we compared with the page.

  • The figure: 94%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Chorus Innovations.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Chorus Innovations.
  • The numbers in our summaryCheckedEach one is printed on the page.
  • Chorus Innovations uses mablCheckedConfirmed line.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

3x“3x faster test creation”Arch Insurance Group uses mabl. Another customer of mabl90%“90% reduction in time spent on test maintenance”Momentum Energy uses mabl. Another customer of mabl20 percent“reduce the time spent on repetitive manual testing by 20 percent”NetForum Cloud uses mabl. Another customer of mabl