Skip to main content
usedby

>75%

reduction in cycle times

As published on zip.com. Captured by usedby on Oct 8, 2026.

What happened

Datadog replaced a fragmented procurement setup of disconnected systems with Zip, centralizing all procurement requests into a single intake with unified approvals. It later moved purchase orders and invoice processing from Coupa into Zip's Procure-to-Pay.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Zip and Datadog, not ours.

  • 4.9 days“Precise cycle times of 4.9 days for purchases, 8.7 days for software, and 19 days for vendor onboarding, reducing times by over 75%”

Procurement cycle times dropped from 30-60 days to 4.9 days for purchases, 8.7 days for software, and 19 days for vendor onboarding.

From the page. zip.com, captured Oct 8, 2026

The decision to implement Zip was closely aligned with a value that's very important to Datadog, and that is always to break down silos.

Michelle Vita, Vice President, Source to Pay, Datadog. Source, captured Oct 8, 2026

What the story claims, and what we checked

We compared the story with its live page on Oct 8, 2026.

  • The figure: >75%CheckedThe figure is on the page; its label is our wording.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Datadog.
  • Datadog uses ZipCheckedConfirmed line. Latest check across sources: Oct 8, 2026.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

~5,700Issues surfaced per monthDatadog uses Greptile. Another tool at Datadog22 days“ADT’s average cycle time is 22 days across all request types”ADT uses Zip. Another customer of Zip95%“Despite hypergrowth, Anthropic achieved 95% policy adoption within the first year.”Anthropic uses Zip. Another customer of Zip