Skip to main content
usedby

33%

“33% reduction in cost”

As published on baseten.co, October 2026. Checked by usedby on Oct 12, 2026.

What happened

Magicare runs an agentic pipeline on Baseten, using a hybrid of a dedicated deployment and Model APIs, to parse long patient referral packets and generate admission recommendations for skilled nursing facilities. The workload involves bursty, high-volume parallel requests that need low latency and high reliability.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of Baseten and Magicare.ai, not ours.

  • 60M“60M TPM of traffic handled”
  • 2 days“2 days saved on average for every rate limit request”

Moving from prepaid rate limits to usage-based pricing reduced costs while eliminating the days-long delays that stalled production.

From the page. baseten.co

What I really care about is latency, reliability, and knowing that my account will not arbitrarily get blocked if we go over some rate limit. I need confidence we can scale without intervention.

Adam Moisa, CTO, Magicare.ai. Source

What the story claims, and what we checked

What we compared with the page.

  • The figure: 33%CheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of Magicare.ai.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of Magicare.ai.
  • The publication dateCheckedRead from the page’s own metadata, never guessed.
  • Magicare.ai uses BasetenCheckedConfirmed line.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

30%“30% lower cost per call”you.com uses Baseten. Another customer of Baseten3x“Baseten’s throughput and latency optimizations delivered 3x savings versus the equivalent closed-source model”Parallel Web Systems uses Baseten. Another customer of Baseten33%“High cache hit rates and cache token pricing enabled OpenCode to achieve a 33% blended cost reduction versus their previous providers.”OpenCode uses Baseten. Another customer of Baseten