Skip to main content
usedby

1.22 weeks

“CodeRabbit estimates 1.22 weeks of reviewer time saved”

As published on coderabbit.ai. Checked by usedby on Oct 19, 2026.

What happened

NetSPI's engineering organization uses CodeRabbit as the first automated layer of pull request review to catch baseline issues in AI-generated code. This frees senior engineers to focus on architecture, security and other contextual questions.

Summary written by usedby from the source page, in English. The figures are those of CodeRabbit and NetSPI, not ours.

  • 56.5%“CodeRabbit has earned broad adoption across NetSPI’s engineering organization with an acceptance rate of 56.5%.”
  • 64.7%“Developers accepted 64.7% of stability and availability findings and 62.7% of data integrity and integration findings.”
  • 58.3%“There was also a 58.3% acceptance rate of major-severity comments.”
  • 69.6%“Over the last three months, there were 140 new Learnings created and applied approximately 4,560 times, reaching 69.6% of reviewed pull requests.”

CodeRabbit became NetSPI’s first review layer, catching recurring baseline issues before senior engineers had to spend their attention on them.

From the page. coderabbit.ai

CodeRabbit being able to come in and catch this baseline level of quality for us has broadly spared the senior devs from needing to go back through and find these simple issues

Andrew Graham, Vice President of Engineering, NetSPI. Source

What the story claims, and what we checked

What we compared with the page.

  • The figure: 1.22 weeksCheckedPrinted word for word on the page, near the name of NetSPI.
  • The passage quoted aboveCheckedCopied word for word from the page, near the name of NetSPI.
  • NetSPI uses CodeRabbitCheckedConfirmed line.
  • The result itselfNot checkedWe quote it; we did not measure it.

Same company, same tool or same industry.

$610K“Gem-E helps NetSPI’s SDR team build $610K pipeline in 5 months”NetSPI uses UserGems. Another tool at NetSPI100 hours“In the last 30 days alone, CodeRabbit has saved an estimated 100 hours of reviewer time”Abnormal uses CodeRabbit. Another customer of CodeRabbit$0“$0 spent on agency fees”IGEL uses Findem. Same industry: Cybersecurity